Inclusive aged care for the LGBTI+ community
By Jane Youell,
While the pandemic still limits our daily lives, and especially the lives of the most vulnerable in our communities, it doesn’t seem a promising time to be discussing creating new care settings where older people and children can share space and time together. However, surely now is the perfect time to plan for the future communities that we want to live in?
Levels of child poverty across the UK were already high before the pandemic: for example, 1 in 4 children in Scotland were living in poverty, and those numbers are now rising. These children are more likely to be unhealthy with poorer mental health, lower resilience and achieve less in school compared to their wealthier peers. We also have a rapidly ageing population with long-term conditions, who are experiencing isolation and loneliness. What if we could do something to change the outcomes for both these communities of people? And what if this could also help to address issues around recruiting care workers?
By harnessing the assets of the older people in our communities, including those living in long-term care and those living with dementia, and supporting them to build deep relationships with children and young people who are experiencing poverty and disadvantage, we can help improve outcomes for both children and older people. Co-locating care settings for children and older people - by including nurseries, after-school clubs and homework clubs within elderly care settings - can help to support the development of meaningful relationships that improve wellbeing for both groups. And, through improved wellbeing children will be more able to realise their potential. For example, it can help to develop skills in children that can help them access education, and provide a sense of purpose for older people that reduces their isolation and loneliness.
My fellow Fellows Lorraine George (CF 2017) and Kay Jodrell (CF 2019) are at the vanguard of shared care and have an intergenerational programme that supports children, childminders and care home residents. We need to learn from them and grow this provision.
As well as nursery provision, there is a considerable untapped opportunity to develop wraparound care in care settings such as:
We can start with mapping the above proposed links in care within a local area, where they have the potential to support both young and older people. Mapping should consider the following:
We don’t, yet. Many of the shared-care approaches across the world don’t formally evaluate their work. There is a humanness in the perceived benefits that is lovely – happier older people, children who accept and understand older adults – and this should not be lost. However, we need to set goals and measure against those if we’re to really understand the possible benefits of shared care and its potential to address the impacts of poverty, disadvantage and loneliness.
We do know that facilitation will be key. Effective shared-care programmes in the USA, Asia and the UK have dedicated facilitation where individuals devise and drive the intergenerational programme. They are often based in either the childcare setting or the eldercare setting, but sometimes there are two facilitators who understand the needs of the people they care for and any workforce needs. Investing in champions who can drive the programme forward helps to embed shared-care approaches and contribute to sustainability.
Housing associations are already working in communities who are affected by poverty and disadvantage. Working with housing associations and other providers also makes intergenerational work scalable. With them and other local partners, we can create a whole neighbourhood approach that supports multi-generational communities – low-cost housing, childcare, eldercare, multi-generational play/exercise, community café and community activity – a whole multi-generational ecosystem approach.
National and local government, regulators and funders have a crucial role to play in thinking creatively to change how we think about and provide care to resolve more than one challenge at a time, including:
The needs of children and older people are often seen to be in competition, whereas the wellbeing of both could be improved by thinking more creatively, joining up policy and practice, and using our resources more efficiently. We talk about children needing ‘one good adult’ to nurture them and help them address the challenges in their lives and we have so many older people ready to be that adult. We need to create multi-generational environments that tap into the assets in our communities and allow children and older people to build relationships that can transform their lives.
Let’s make it easier, not harder, to do something that is simple and makes sense.
The views and opinions expressed by any Fellow are those of the Fellow and not of the Churchill Fellowship or its partners, which have no responsibility or liability for any part of them.
By David Slater,
By Patrick Branigan,