In October 2025, I travelled to the USA to set out on the first leg of my Churchill Fellowship to answer a question at the very heart of my working life as a corporate parent with Police Scotland: “How can we protect and support the care-experienced community?”
What I found is that "protection" in the USA is being redefined. It is moving away from a cold, clinical bureaucracy that merely monitors failure, and towards approaches that ground children and help build a foundation for them.
In the USA, the definition of a good police officer, support worker, or social worker is shifting towards what can be called the "Second Base Rule." In the heat of a moment, when a choice is 50/50, real protection requires the courage to, in baseball terms, "call the child safe." It is an act of mercy and trust that keeps a child in the game when the rules of the world can feel stacked against them.
In Albany, The Schuyler Center highlighted how the terminology we use to protect can actually erode a child's sense of self. When the system uses an acronym like LAC (Looked After Child), it thinks it is being professional. But to a ten-year-old, it sounds exactly like the word "lack." By defining children by what they are missing, we inadvertently force them to view themselves through a lens of deficit.
The “Coat Test”, introduced to me by The Osborne Association in New York City, offered another way to think about protection. In a traditional model, if a child is shivering, the system’s instinct is mandated reporting – documenting the neglect. But Osborne argues for mandated supporting. They recognise that you cannot address a child’s behaviour or trauma if their basic material needs are unmet. When a child is shivering, you don't immediately file a report; you give them a coat.